SmokeFreeOhio

With scientific evidence showing that secondhand smoke was dangerous to public health, the call to ban smoking in public places grew nationwide. In 2006, multiple states had smoking bans on the ballot–including Ohio.

For Ohio voters, however, this meant deciding between two competing initiatives to regulate smoking in public places. After overcoming legal challenges from Smoke Less Ohio, the group supporting the competing initiative (Ohio Issue 4), the Smoke Free Workplace Act (aka Ohio Issue 5) passed, with 58.5% of Ohio voters approving to ban smoking in public places. But advocacy didn’t stop there. The groups supporting the Smoke Free Workplace Act continued their advocacy to address the legal challenges that came after votes were cast.

Proponents:

Opposed by:

SmokeFreeOhio

Smoke Less Ohio was lead by opponents who put a competing initiative on the ballot as Ohio Issue 4

vs.

American Cancer Society

provided staff and resources in support of Ohio Issue 5 to protect people “from the deadly consequences of tobacco use and secondhand smoke.”

https://www.fightcancer.org/releases/big-tobacco-fighting-ballot-initiatives-would-protect-public-health

Tobacco Companies RJ Reynolds & Philip Morris

backed a competing statute called Smoke Less Ohio (aka Ohio Issue 4) that would have banned smoking in public spaces with broad exceptions, including restaurants, bars and bowling alleys.

This second initiative confused voters, and because it was a constitutional amendment, it would have trumped the Smoke Free Workplace statutory initiative had it passed.

https://www.ideastream.org/health-science/2006-10-30/big-tobacco-fights-back

vs.

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids

said the initiative would “keep kids from smoking and help more smokers quit, thereby saving many lives.”

https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/press-releases/id_0951

Ohio Licensed Beverage Association

helped sponsor Smoke Less Ohio (aka Ohio Issue 4).

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2642532/

vs.

Result:

Ohioans saw through the haze of two competing initiatives to ban smoking in public places and cast a strong majority vote. Decades later, many can’t even imagine smoking in public spaces.

Timeline

What happened?
Date
Step

Petition filed

November 17, 2005

The Initiative Petition was filed with the Secretary of State’s office with over 167,000 signatures.

https://law.justia.com/cases/ohio/tenth-district-court-of-appeals/2006/2006-ohio-4690.html

Protests filed with Boards of Elections

December, 2005 – March 2006

Jacob Evans, representative of the competing Smoke Less campaign, filed protests in 34 counties.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/oh-supreme-court/1153286.html

The Secretary of State transmitted the proposed statute to the clerks for the General Assembly's consideration, but no action was taken by the legislature.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/oh-supreme-court/1153286.html

December 28, 2005

Petition transmitted to the General Assembly

Jacob Evans filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for Franklin County because the proposed statute was transmitted to the General Assembly before court filings were resolved.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/oh-supreme-court/1153286.html

January 3, 2006

Complaint filed in the Court of Appeals

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled the initiative petition could move forward.

https://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/10/2006/2006-Ohio-3453.pdf

June 30, 2006

Ohio Supreme Court issued ruling

A supplemental initiative petition was filed with the Ohio Secretary of State.

https://www.ohiosos.gov/assets/dir2006-56.pdf

July 28, 2006

Petition submitted to the Secretary of State

The Secretary of State sent the petition to the county Boards of Elections to certify signatures.

SmokeFreeOhio Initiative Petition Proposing a Statute

August 14, 2006

Petition sent to the Boards of Elections for certification

The Secretary of State ordered the Boards of Elections to place the SmokeFreeOhio initiative on the November 7, 2006 ballot as Issue 5.

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/oh-supreme-court/1153286.html

September 8, 2006

Issue 5 ordered on ballot

The Ohio Court of Appeals, Tenth District allowed the county Boards of Elections to continue certification of petition signatures.

https://law.justia.com/cases/ohio/tenth-district-court-of-appeals/2006/2006-ohio-4690.html

September 11, 2006

Appeals Court ruled in favor of SmokeFreeOhio

The Secretary of State’s office notified petitioners of insufficient signatures.

https://www.ohiosos.gov/assets/dir2006-70.pdf

September 19, 2006

Petition signatures deemed insufficient

Supplemental petition signatures approved to put Smoke Free Initiated Statute on November ballot.

https://www.ohiosos.gov/assets/dir2006-70.pdf

September 29, 2006

Signatures submitted

The Secretary of State confirmed a sufficient number of signatures was filed to put the Smoke Free Workplace Act on the November 7, 2006 ballot.

STATE EVANS v. BLACKWELL (2006) | FindLaw

October 5, 2006

Supplemental signatures verified

Issue 5 (SmokeFreeOhio) passed with 58.5% of the vote.

Issue 4 (Smoke Less Ohio) failed, with 35.89% voting Yes and 64.11% voting No.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ohio_Issue_5,_Prohibit_Smoking_in_Public_Places_Initiative_(2006)

November 7, 2006

Voters approved Issue 5

December 7, 2006

Law took effect

The Ohio Department of Health began enforcing the law.

https://odh.ohio.gov/know-our-programs/smoke-free-workplace-program

May 3, 2007

Enforcement began

The Ohio Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge regarding the constitutionality of the Smoke Free Workplace Act.

https://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/litigation-tracker/bartec-inc-v-theodore-wymsylo-ohio-dept-health-et-al-970-ne2d-898-ohio-2012

April 6, 2011

Supreme Court agreed to hear challenge

The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality and enforcement of the Smoke Free Workplace Act in a unanimous decision.

https://www.ohioappeals.com/2012/05/articles/ohio-supreme-court-watch/merit-decision-court-upholds-ohios-smoke-free-workplace-act-wymsylo-v-bartec/

May 23, 2012

Supreme Court upheld the law

July 25, 2012

Supreme Court denied motion for reconsideration