Delay tactics stall Ohio Voter Bill of Rights Amendment before it starts.

Brief overview:

When supporters of a proposed "voter bill of rights" constitutional amendment filed their initial paperwork with the Ohio Attorney General in late 2023 and early 2024, he rejected it—asserting for the first time in office history that he could reject initiative petitions based on their titles. He claimed the "voter bill of rights" title violated state law, even though his predecessor had approved that exact title on another petition just a few years earlier. The Attorney General's refusal blocked the circulation process and forced the petitioners to go to court.

The Ohio Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Attorney General had no such authority, but took an unusually long eight months to decide, preventing the petitioners from reaching the 2024 ballot. The General Assembly later amended state law (House Bill 74 | 135th General Assembly | Ohio Legislature) to give the Attorney General the very authority the court said he lacked, creating a new hurdle for future ballot initiatives.

AG rejects title without having authority to do so

Proponents:

Opposed by:

Ohio NAACP
Ohio Organizing Collaborative

Secretary of State Frank LaRose
Attorney General Dave Yost

vs.

Ohio NAACP and Ohio Organizing Collaborative brought forward an amendment that includes:

  • Allow automatic voter registration for eligible Ohioans unless they opt out and automatic updates to voter registration as part of routine visits to BMV

  • Allow Ohioans to register to vote and cast ballot on same day

  • Allow counties to expand early-voting hours and locations for early in- person voting and for ballot drop boxes.

  • Allow in-person voters to sign an affidavit swearing to their identity and rescinds stricter Photo ID requirements

  • Require the State to institute tracking system for absentee ballots and ballot applications

  • Make persons who attempt voter fraud to be subject to criminal penalties

Petition: Ohio Voters Bill of Rights

Secretary of State Frank LaRose:

  • Called it a “direct assault on the integrity of our voting process “

  • Attributes the initiative to “radical interests”

  • The initiative is “designed to make elections easier to steal”

Secretary LaRose Blasts Proposed Constitutional Amendment as Radical Effort to Undermine Election Integrity - Ohio Secretary of State

vs.

Petition was submitted twice to the Attorney General’s office for approval of the summary language.

Both petitions were rejected by the Attorney General first for “omissions and misstatements” and then for a “highly misleading and misrepresentative” title

Ohio attorney general rejects voting- rights coalition’s ballot petition for a 2nd time | Ideastream Public Media

vs.

Suit filed with the Supreme Court of Ohio seeking to overturn the rejection of the petition title. An expedited hearing was also requested.

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost sued after rejection of voting rights initiative petition

Not only was an expedited hearing not granted, it took the Supreme Court eight months before it ruled in favor of the petitioners thus pushing the amendment from the 2024 election cycle.

Attorney General Not Authorized To Review Proposed Amendment Titles

vs.

Result:

Because Supreme Court Ruling was not until October 30, 2024 there was no time to finish the process to get Ohio Voter Bill of Rights on the November 5, 2024 ballot as planned.

  • No time to gather signatures

  • No time for signatures to be certified

  • No time for ballot language to be written/approved

  • No time for language to be printed on ballot

    In fact, Ballot Board did not advance the constitutional amendment until November 18, 2024.

What’s next?

Undetermined as signature collection is still needed. Maybe it will reach the voters in November 2026?

Timeline of the initiative:

What happened
Date
Step

Rejected by Attorney General for “omissions and misstatements”
Instructions

December 28, 2023

1st Petition Filed

Rejected by Attorney General for based on the title “not fairly or accurately” summarizing the content of the proposed amendment.
Letter is included in the link below.

January 25, 2024

Revised Petition Filed

Unanimous decision that Attorney General could not review title of petition, just the summary
Attorney General Not Authorized To Review Proposed Amendment Titles

November 8, 2024

Ohio Supreme Ruled

Signature Collection

Expected to begin in 2026